VP Debate — fairness, or violent expropriation?

Senator Biden seems to have a problem understanding the difference between true, genuine, Christian charity, and violent expropriation of wealth that requires, if his logic were to be followed to its rueful conclusion, the barrel of a gun.  Senator McCain is neither perfect nor a true liberal-conservative, but at least he is aware of this simple difference.

SBQ

5 Responses to “VP Debate — fairness, or violent expropriation?”

  1. [...] VP Debate — fairness, or violent expropriation? [...]

  2. Dartmouth Strong says:

    Perhaps you’d care to cite an example for your foregoing comment, and further elaborate on its relevance to any particular subject. It appears to be rather a sweeping and non-factual generalization about Mr. Biden than has neither merit nor proof.

  3. Jeff Toms says:

    Hi, my name is SBQ and I like to write empty blog articles with no references, citations, or examples to back my argument. I also support monopolies, trusts and slavery. Did I mention that I go to Brown University? It was built on the back of slave labor.

  4. sbquigley says:

    I was posting around the time of the debate itself, in which the attempt to appeal to the supposed middle class was the incessant focus of both candidates. If you do not enjoy my brief comments on the debate (‘in real time’, as it were), then please do not read them. But at least you took the time to understand my views…

    SBQ

  5. Hi, my name is Jeff Toms and I like to jump on the Quigley-hating bandwagon. I also think that 9/11 was an inside job. I hate America and I want all the soldiers in Iraq to die. I came to a liberal school because I want to be amongst people who think exactly like me. When I disagree with Sean Quigley, I don’t know how to respond, so I throw out the same platitudinous rhetoric indicative of most Brown students.

    Congratulations Mr. Toms, you have truly offered a well-stated, salient criticism of Mr. Quigley’s writing.

Leave a Reply